Alex Obadia
Leads Scaling Trust, a £50m R&D programme for AI agent coordination infrastructure. Co-founder of Flashbots.
Building on the momentum of the Stanford AO Summit, the conversation on autonomous organizations continues in London.
Co-hosted by AO Commons and ARIA's Scaling Trust programme, the London Autonomous Organization Summit is a working summit bringing together researchers and builders to advance the emerging field of autonomous organizations (AO). AOs are already taking many forms, from agent swarms and AI villages to autonomous vending machines.
Drawing researchers and builders working at the frontiers of AI, agentic systems, governance, and organizational design, the summit will explore the theory, benchmarks, infrastructure, and practical playbooks needed to understand and build this new class of organizations.
Among the questions discussed:
Leads Scaling Trust, a £50m R&D programme for AI agent coordination infrastructure. Co-founder of Flashbots.
Researches multi-agent intelligence and cooperation, and created Concordia, an open-source platform for generative social simulation.
Applies mathematics to organizational design at the intersection of artificial and collective intelligence.
Works on AI policy, high-skilled immigration and the commercialisation of research.
Builds AI for science and healthcare, and co-authored Virtual Agent Economies, on markets run by AI agents.
Studies how AI agents should be designed and deployed to fit human values, on the Humanity, Ethics and Alignment Research team.
Computer scientist. Led research teams at Protocol Labs and studied at MIT under Tim Berners-Lee.
Works on cooperative AI, multi-agent safety, and institutions for collective intelligence. Kavli Fellow of the US National Academy of Sciences.
Researches how blockchain networks, decentralized AI agents, and protocol infrastructures reshape trust and governance.
Works on data-sovereign AI for governance and public goods funding, and builds AI tools with Indigenous and local communities.
Builds cooperative, safe AI agents that learn, coordinate and align with humans. Turing Fellow at the Alan Turing Institute.
Studies how people and AI agents behave together, from multi-agent negotiation to the collective behavior of generative AI.
Builds General Reasoning, which trains AI to work and coordinate over long horizons, including Avalon-M1, a model that runs agent organizations.
Builds foundation models of human societies. In 2023 he led a study of a society of 33,000 AI agents, and now simulates what protects societies against information attacks.
Former Executive Director of DAOstar, where he led the development of open standards and infrastructure for decentralized organizations.
Former Ecosystem Lead at the Stellar Development Foundation, where she led funding programs, partnerships, and governance initiatives.
Breakfast
In this talk, I will show how we built Avalon-M1, a new type of language model trained as an agent organisation. I will detail our core RLCR recipe that allowed us to train a long-horizon, multi-agent setup successfully. I will also share some of our findings, including emerging organisational structures and oversight results. Finally I will share my thoughts on the road ahead, including scaling to much bigger collective structures.
Coffee break
Lightning talks followed by discussion
How can autonomous agents learn to cooperate, adapt to human preferences, and interact safely at scale? This talk connects three research directions: scalable multi-agent simulation, learning from mixed-quality human feedback, and expressing safety boundaries through natural language. Together, these approaches address practical challenges in building cooperative AI grounded in human contexts. I will conclude with a research agenda for trustworthy agent societies, where learning, coordination, and safety must continue beyond deployment.
Networks of communicating AI agents are being deployed faster than anyone can predict their collective behavior. Over the past months, agents from several AI companies acted beyond the boundaries of their test environments, breached company servers and accessed systems from a variety of public and private institutions, in some cases coordinating through improvised and unsanctioned channels no human directed. We argue that collective behavior is unpredictable from individual AI agent behavior for three reasons: composition, nonlinearity and emergent, opaque communication. Current agentic AI evaluations study small, fixed, homogeneous AI agent teams in sandboxes, over short episodes, under a single operator, and current law attaches obligations to individual models or use cases. We propose a typology of AI collectives to guide testing, long-horizon and open-world evaluation, and the designation of specified agentic deployments as high-risk activities.
Lunch
AI agents can increasingly make decisions, use tools and carry out work autonomously. But the law was built for a world where a person or company sits behind every contract, payment and professional decision.
This talk looks at what happens when those assumptions start to break. Drawing on recent British Progress research into AI adoption in the UK, I’ll explore the surprisingly practical legal barriers facing autonomous agents: from data protection and professional licensing to payments, contracts and the unresolved question of who is liable when an agent gets something wrong.
The way we talk about Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI) is a contingent inheritance of our particular intellectual history. This paper argues that the prevailing discourse, which centers on a solitary optimizing agent, has obscured the socio-cognitive and institutional dynamics crucial to determining whether self-improvement actually compounds or degenerates. We propose a redescription of RSI in multi-agent terms, shifting focus from internal properties, like an agent's “curiosity” or “taste”, to the problem problem: how the surrounding ecosystem generates sequences of problems to solve. This vocabulary situates RSI within the broader conversation around autonomous science and allows us to describe multiple mechanisms of self-improvement in a way that makes salient that there can be no panaceas for AI governance. By changing our language we re-orient our collective thinking to facilitate the practical work needed to govern RSI.
Lightning talks followed by discussion
Break
Lightning talks followed by discussion
As multi-agent systems become more intelligent, individual agent alignment is failing to compose to the group level. How should humanity create technologies that can collaborate and innovate with us, rather than compete with our resources?
The London AO Summit is a working convening with limited capacity. RSVP through Luma and we will confirm attendance as we finalize the program.
Building, researching, or funding the field of autonomous organizations? Apply as a speaker through the same form.